“The irregularities in these submissions suggest that they were collected with generative AI,” the judges wrote in a statement. “We are worried about the quote of false cases in the order of the court.”
Lynch did not answer immediately on telephone and e -mail inquiries about the judgment. In 1995 she was admitted to Georgia in Georgia and, according to State Bar of Georgia Records, acts as a solo practitioner in Stone Mountain.
ExploreThe Atlanta Spa has to pay 13 million US dollars for the client attack, says the jury
The judges said it could be the first time that an appellate court in Georgia faced the problems that can arise from the obvious use of artificial intelligence by the lawyer that creates content. They said other dishes had adjusted the problem.
The Supreme Court of the US Court of Justice, John Roberts, warned in his 2023 report on the judiciary that AI applications can usually be susceptible to “hallucinations”, which means that lawyers submit letters, citing fake cases, said the judges of Georgia.
They said that Lynch's use of fictional cases and quotes to support their client, a husband who submitted divorce in 2022, had robbed his ex-wife the opportunity to react appropriately.
The case recording shows that the Lynch customer submitted a divorce in Dekalb County in April 2022 and received a divorce decree in July this year. In October 2023, his ex-wife asked the district judge to reopen the case and put the divorce decree aside. She claimed that she moved to Texas in 2021 and was not properly served with the complaint.
The judge of the DEKALB County Superior Court, Yolanda Parker-Smith, denied the ex-wife's application in a three-sided order in May 2024.
ExploreGeorgia cannot restrict the social media accounts of minors, says Richter
In the appeal of the ex-wife, she pointed out that the legal judge relied on two fake cases in the order and made it invalid.
The appellant said that Parker-Smith's command signed by Lynch seems to have been created, which, among other things, cited the same two fictional cases in their subsequent case.
They said Lynch added an insult to the injury by requesting the legal fees with regard to the appeal of the ex-wife and even using a wrong case to support the request.
“We cannot find the Johnson case quoted against Johnson with falling names or quote,” said the judges. “And not surprising, we could not find the case through his alleged participation, which is an obvious wrong statement by the law.”
The judges imposed Lynch the maximum punishment for their “light -hearted” offer for legal fees. They sent the case back to the judge of Dekalb County to rethink the ex-wife's request to give up the divorce decree.
ExploreJury clears the Texas Roadhouse to the guilt of Georgia Boy's death, which was hit by car
Your opinion refers to a study by Stanford researcher, the generative AI models, including chatgpt, in about 75% of the cases in about 75% of the time when you answer questions about the kernel decision of a court.
The submissions in a consumer credit in which a federal judge is pending in Atlanta show that the plaintiff's lawyer was recently asked to explain their written references to a case and a quote that the judge could not find.
In an answer from June 26, the lawyer Naja Hawk confirmed that she could not localize the reference case or verify the quote and withdrew her trust in her and said that you should have been incorrectly included.
The effects of artificial secret services on the courts of Georgia are assessed by a judicial committee, chaired by Georgia Andrew Pinson's Supreme Court, and supported by the National Center for State Court.
The committee is commissioned to form recommendations in order to maintain the trust and trust of public trust in the state's judicial system if the use of artificial intelligence increases.
